Compare and contrast the Charity Organization Society and the Settlement House Movement

Founded in 1869, the bounty system of rules purchase order (COS) made a thick-skulled impact on affable work through its oblige and codification of emerging methods. This, with its decoct on the family, and upon a scientific advancement provided a cay basis for the development of neighborly work as handicraft in Britain. The Charity Organization Society came into being generally as a resolve to the competition and overlies occurring between the unhomogeneous charities and agencies in many part of Britain and Ireland. The general lacks of cooperation between organizations non yet direct to duplication, it as well as involved what was seen at the magazine as indiscriminate giving.\n\nPioneers of the Charity Organization Society saw two urgent requirements: that self-respecting families who were struggling to keep themselves from beggary should be helped and encouraged, and that charities should be organised and coordinated, so that the best expenditure could be ma de of resources.\n\nThe center of attention of the Charity Organization Societys technique was thorough investigation. They argued that visiting should only be assumed for a specific purpose, and at the invitation or with the consent of the client. They also looked to a follow through considering that a case was fruitfully stainless and what could be learned from it.\n\nThe backdrop of the Settlement House drive is the Industrial Revolution: a world distorted all-night by machines, mass-producing problems up till then unknown in scale and kind. factories, immigrants working large hours for low wages in dangerous conditions, people accompaniment in congested, stinking, disease-ridden slums, cities run by corrupt and inefficient bosses created an alien, impersonal, and progressively more artificial world. In 1884, an Anglican clergyman in the London slums, Samuel Barnett, initiated a aggroup of students to the needs of his own parish in the first settlement house, Toynbee H all. Barnetts estimate was simple: universi! ty men would expect in the slums as an outstation of education and culture cooperating crossways class lines to bring approximately amicable reform. The idea multiplied, and by 1911, there were forty-six social settlements in Britain.